I'm on someone's media list
It's unfortunate I'm on a few media lists because those sending me news releases haven't read my blog. This isn't the time or the place to name names. I left that practice with my last gig as an investigative reporter.
Until today, I was annoyed by the unwanted mail. If someone is going to send me a news release, it should be about a new social media tool that helps PR professionals do their job better. Or a tool that cuts cost and improves communication. Those are things that interest me. Oh, and if you've had a partucularly stellar PR campaign where social media was used effectively, I like those stories as well.
Geoff Livingston is annoyed too. "Having your name added to PR lists from vendors like Vocus and Cision
is one of the unfortunate outcomes of having a successful blog," he wrote. "The resulting amount of spam and bad pitches can be quite astounding."
Livingston writes for The Buzz Bin and owns Washington DC-based Livingston Communications, has resigned to the fact that blogging successfully will inevitably earn you a spot on someone's media list. Which is fine, but only if that list is used correctly and relationships with bloggers -- like journalists -- are nurtured and developed. "Instead, I’ve resigned to the situation, accepting it as the nature of the business," he wrote. "Nothing typifies PR’s ill health more than the appearance of a familiar spammer."
I'd like to think my colleagues get blogger relations. It's really not much different than good media relations. Louis Gray writes the Silicon Valley Blog for early adopters, technology geeks, RSS addicts and Mac freaks. His take is apropos:
Not every public relations firm is an expert in dealing with bloggers. Some are waking up to the blogging phenomenon and, guessing at the influencers, are simply adding blogger e-mail addresses to their distribution lists, without taking the time needed to see what it is each blogger covers, learning their focus areas, or personalizing an angle. Others are aggressively hustling the top two to five names and ignoring the second layer – which creates stress for those pursued, and resentment for those who are ignored.
I'm not of the before generation like my professors and mentors in the industry. And I can't speak to how journalists circa 1999 outed bad pitching and flogged those for doing such. I was still writing for the Indiana Daily Student and stumbling my way back from the bars on Friday night. However, from the earliest days of my proseefional reporting career (post IU), I was annoyed by those news releases that popped into my inbox, which had little to do with my beat, the people in my town and readers of my paper. Almost always I'd delete them, unless one had a snazy subject line. Only then, and if I had a minute or two, would I read it.
Where I'm working now, we are organizing a blogger summit. We are bringing in top bloggers from the United States, and I think Canada too. Our goal is to get to know them better. To begin building relationships with them. Understand their needs and what they like to write about. In the spirit of two-way communication, we are also asking them what they'd like to see from us. That's important.
Bad pitching, I think will always presist. There's just too many of my colleagues that don't give a damn, or they haven't trained their junior staff in proper relationship building with bloggers and mainstream journalists. And that's why we'll always that The Bad Pitch Blog and my favorite, Chris Anderson's blog -- The Long Tail. About two years ago, Anderson outed several for their bad pitching. See "Sorry PR people: you're blocked."
Blogger relations isn't hard, folks. As a former journalist, turned PR professional with nack for social media, it just a little TLC.



